Two numbers from two different trials are not a comparison. They only look like one.
Industry codes require any comparison between products to be fair and based on comparable aspects. Yet I still see reps put their trial next to a competitor's trial and draw a conclusion the data cannot carry.
Why cross-trial comparisons fail:
- Two drugs, two trials, two different groups of patients.
- Different durations, different endpoints, different baseline severity.
- It looks like a comparison. It is not one.
- A head-to-head trial is different:
- Two drugs, one trial, the same patients.
- Same duration, same endpoint, same starting point.
- That is a comparison a doctor can rely on.
- The wrong sentence: "Ours lowered it more than theirs did in their trial."
- The right sentence: "In the head-to-head trial, this was the difference, Doctor."
And when no head-to-head trial exists, the honest sentence is simply that. Specialists will catch a cross-trial claim immediately, and they remember the rep who made it.
“If there is no head-to-head trial, say so. That sentence costs you less than a lost doctor.”

Lesson 8 of 11 in Step 3: Knowing the science, with the full guide and a checklist for this week.